Rafe pointed to this incredibly disturbing and depressing analysis of the television show The Office.
So why is promoting over-performing losers logical? The simple reason is that if you over-perform at the loser level, it is clear that you are an idiot. You’ve already made a bad bargain, and now you’re delivering more value than you need to, making your bargain even worse. Unless you very quickly demonstrate that you know your own value by successfully negotiating more money and/or power, you are marked out as an exploitable clueless loser.
I have only seen a minutes of the show itself, but could basically get the gist of what the guy is talking about even without knowing any of the characters. Coincidentally, I read this on the same day that I saw the Youtube that everyone is linking to with the 100 best quotes from The Wire — “the game’s out there and it’s either play or get played.” Self-awareness about one’s role in the game will keep you out of the ‘clueless’ masses described in the Office analysis article. But feeling like a chump ain’t all that much fun either.
It’s always a question for me how well such analyses apply to organizations like universities or certain kinds of not-for-profit organizations or government agencies–some pathologies become even more extreme, of course, but some things just don’t seem to apply at all. There are certain embedded assumptions regarding capitalism in analyses like this. And in my view many of our embedded assumptions about capitalism are just plain wrong. In any event, it’s possible to get played in any organization and it’s hard not to become cynical about what groups of people organized into firms, organizations, and institutions do if you pay attention even a little bit.
Le sigh.
I swear that I linked this article on Twitter ages ago… But between Twitter search being lame and URL shorteners I can’t find it. :-S
Anyway, good points about the fact that some of this definitely does not apply in academia. But, yeah, institutions are broken. I miss Red Rock Eater. Taught me much of what I know about institutions…
Oh, I miss RRE too. Whatever happened to Agre?
Holy smokes! He’s missing since sometime between last Spring.
Chronicle of Higher Education:
http://chronicle.com/article/FriendsColleagues-Search/49222/
Facebook Group:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=wall&gid=179572356500
Ehm, should say “since sometime last Spring.”
I knew that his RRE list postings had first dwindled and then dropped to zero over the last several years. But I had thought of RRE from time to time, and would then Google him and find that he was still at UCLA.
So, after this exchange on Wednesday, I did that again. Only this time I found that his pages were no longer linked by his department at UCLA, but I could find no more recent information. And now today the fact that he has been missing for the better part of a year turns up in the Chronicle. What a sad state of affairs.
Oddly, I ran across a mention of him being missing on a completely unrelated mailing list while looking at stuff related to Google’s ‘Go’ language announcement.