<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sherlock Holmes, etc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uncorked.org/medley/2009/12/sherlock-holmes-etc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uncorked.org/medley/2009/12/sherlock-holmes-etc/</link>
	<description>Since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:54:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medley</title>
		<link>http://uncorked.org/medley/2009/12/sherlock-holmes-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-2781</link>
		<dc:creator>Medley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncorked.org/medley/?p=1205#comment-2781</guid>
		<description>Well, do keep in mind that I hadn&#039;t seen a movie... since Star Trek, I guess. So my thresholds are probably altered. But here are a couple of other blog reviews I found interesting: 

http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006452.html

http://www.eccentricflower.com/index.php/Eccentric_Flower:201001/Sherlock_Holmes

http://cleolinda.livejournal.com/835800.html

(That last one is quite funny.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, do keep in mind that I hadn&#8217;t seen a movie&#8230; since Star Trek, I guess. So my thresholds are probably altered. But here are a couple of other blog reviews I found interesting: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006452.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ghostinthemachine.net/006452.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.eccentricflower.com/index.php/Eccentric_Flower:201001/Sherlock_Holmes" rel="nofollow">http://www.eccentricflower.com/index.php/Eccentric_Flower:201001/Sherlock_Holmes</a></p>
<p><a href="http://cleolinda.livejournal.com/835800.html" rel="nofollow">http://cleolinda.livejournal.com/835800.html</a></p>
<p>(That last one is quite funny.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acm</title>
		<link>http://uncorked.org/medley/2009/12/sherlock-holmes-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator>acm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncorked.org/medley/?p=1205#comment-2779</guid>
		<description>wow, it&#039;s had such bad reviews that I wasn&#039;t planning to try to catch it, especially with the raft of late-year intriguing offerings.  but now I&#039;m rethinking...

anyway, while you&#039;re tweaking your Netflix queue, you should add in the first season of House, because it&#039;s pretty good stuff.  there was one season where he was such an ass it could be unpleasant to watch, but overall there&#039;s a lot of good stuff there, in character and wry gamesmanship, all grafted onto a sort of medical procedural that is diverting enough in its own way...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, it&#8217;s had such bad reviews that I wasn&#8217;t planning to try to catch it, especially with the raft of late-year intriguing offerings.  but now I&#8217;m rethinking&#8230;</p>
<p>anyway, while you&#8217;re tweaking your Netflix queue, you should add in the first season of House, because it&#8217;s pretty good stuff.  there was one season where he was such an ass it could be unpleasant to watch, but overall there&#8217;s a lot of good stuff there, in character and wry gamesmanship, all grafted onto a sort of medical procedural that is diverting enough in its own way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni Reiss</title>
		<link>http://uncorked.org/medley/2009/12/sherlock-holmes-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-2770</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni Reiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncorked.org/medley/?p=1205#comment-2770</guid>
		<description>oooh.  thanks for the review.  i may have to read all the books as well before seeing the movie.  i was interested in seeing it just for the law/downey effect, but i&#039;m glad that it&#039;s a worthy spy/caper/thriller....   as opposed to the twilight flicks that i must watch because i just have to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oooh.  thanks for the review.  i may have to read all the books as well before seeing the movie.  i was interested in seeing it just for the law/downey effect, but i&#8217;m glad that it&#8217;s a worthy spy/caper/thriller&#8230;.   as opposed to the twilight flicks that i must watch because i just have to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

